The bill to revamp the way Wyoming pays its K-12 school districts is headed to one final reading in the state House of Representatives after House members voted Tuesday to keep the âinstructional siloâ intact.
Thatâs a provision saying that, while school districts have been able to pull money from instruction to fund other things like support staff or equipment where needed, theyâll no longer be able to do that.
The wages of teachers, paraprofessionals, tutors, paraeducators and instructional aides will be in a âsiloâ of the state grant.
Crafted last year in the Select Committee on School Finance Recalibration, the silo follows a February 2025 court order in which Laramie County District Court Judge Peter Froelicher said a teacher shortage, linked with salary shortfalls, is one of the defects in the Legislatureâs funding model.
Senate File 81, the bill to recalibrate what the state Legislature pays public school districts, left the Senate on Feb. 23 with language that would add about $290 million per biennium to Wyomingâs $3.6 billion two-year school funding plan.
Rep. JD Williams, R-Lusk, urged his fellow House members on Tuesday to let districts access 15% of the instructional silo for other purposes as needed. Â
His amendment was about flexibility for small school districts like the ones in his area, he said. Â
âNeighbors, this is an attempt to give my local districts a little bit of latitude,â began Williams. âI donât think the goal is to cut secretaries, custodians ⌠or extracurricular programs, but these are the hard conversations Iâm having with my district.â Â
Ultimately, the House rejected Williamsâ amendment.
The recalibration bill must survive one more reading in the House, an approval of House changes by the Senate, and the governor's desk to become law.Â
But First, The Debate
House Education Committee Chair Ocean Andrew, R-Laramie, opposed the amendment, saying it âreally defeats the entire purpose of the silo.â
House Appropriations Chair John Bear, R-Gillette, likewise opposed Williamsâ amendment, pointing to the extensive research and deliberation the recalibration undertook last year in drafting the bill.
Bear indicated that the only reason one would want to erode the silo would be to take money out of it, not put back into it.
Thatâs because districts have the latitude to add more money to classrooms than the amounts in the silo, but not take it out, he noted.
And he said the new recalibration bill, which contemplates teacher raises and other gains for schools, will ensure those other areas are funded.
Rep. Christopher Knapp, R-Gillette, said he believes in leaving control in the hands of local government.
âBut they have to be part of the solution,â said Knapp. âNot continually saying, âNot enough, need more.ââ
On And For
Rep. Bob Davis, R-Baggs, backed Williamsâ effort, saying flexibility is paramount in rural communities.
âIâm listening to my local teachers,â he said. âIâm going to listen to the experts in my area.â
Rep. Steve Harshman, R-Casper, echoed that, calling the silo a uniform, cookie-cutter approach to a complex environment.
Williams said the silo risks shortchanging safety officers, food service workers and costs associated with extracurricular activities.
âFolks at home, they ask me some accountability questions,â said Williams. âIf I really believe government closest to the people governs the best, why am I taking away this decision-making authority from my local board? Iâll just pass that along. Itâs been good for me to think about.â
Ka-Boom
A clash unfurled when House Majority Floor Leader Scott Heiner, R-Green River, successfully advanced an amendment to subject all school districts to one âregional cost adjustmentâ model, which the Legislatureâs education consultants call the hedonic wage index. Â
As the bill sat before Heinerâs change, it offered three different tests, depending on the situation. Those included the hedonic wage index and the Wyoming cost-of-living index, and a baseline calculation.
House Minority Floor Leader Mike Yin, D-Jackson, had advocated that second method, saying the hedonic wage index on its own gives too much weight to non-tangible living factors and doesnât capture the complex housing market in his area.
âSo the recalibration bill is a compromise in a bunch of different areas,â said Yin, adding that heâd supported the silo to recognize the compromise effort.
âWhat this amendment does is, it blows up the compromise,â said Yin.
Yin registered a formal protest after Heinerâs amendment passed, saying the action was unconstitutional.
Heiner had argued the opposite, saying his amendment makes the recalibration bill âdefensibleâ by not âtreating one district differently than all the rest.â
Yin also sparred with Bear.
Bear said the cost-of-living compromise Yin favored was, according to âour attorneys,â putting the bill at risk of faltering in court.
âReally frustrating to hear that members are speaking for our attorneys,â parried Yin.
He said he couldnât speak directly for his local school district, but said the state could expect to see another lawsuit if, conversely, the House passed Heinerâs amendment.
Feeding Frenzy
Heiner successfully advanced another amendment raising a growth cap on teacher raises.
Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, had capped the teacher raises at 5% each year for three years while the bill was on the Senate side, so the substantial new boosts in teacher pay would not drive a frenzy of districts poaching each otherâs teachers and artificially driving up wages with bidding wars.
Heiner asked the House to boost that cap to 10%, and it did.
The bill contemplates average teacher salaries at $75,863 per year, a boost from about $67,000.
Rothfuss during the billâs time in the Senate also removed a controversial provision requiring school districts to use the stateâs insurance instead of insurance programs of their choice.
But Rothfuss confined insurance payouts to actual employees, instead of the âghostâ employees the funding model allows but districts havenât hired.
Clair McFarland can be reached at clair@cowboystatedaily.com.





