Seeking a cheap and effective way to protect livestock from predators, Utah researchers think theyâve found the answer â sticking flashing lights on sheep and cattle to scare off coyotes, wolves and other marauding carnivores.
Flashing ear tags, or FlashTags as theyâre called, are one of the latest attempts to keep predators from killing livestock, without having to kill the predators.
Thereâs been a few tests of the technology in Wyoming and other Western states. The results of one pilot program
The Northern Ag Network reported that early results of test runs seem promising.
The results werenât always perfect, one of the lead developers told Cowboy State Daily.
On one Montana ranch, a grizzly killed a calf that was wearing a tag, said Julie Young, associate professor and director of the Berryman Institute of Wildlife Damage Management at Utah State University.
The light-up tags are motion activated, and apparently the calf didnât move, she said.
âWe had one rancher in Montana that considered it a failure. He lost a calf to a grizzly bear,â she said.
âThe calf didnât even move, it was asleep,â Young added.
Wonât Predators Get Use To It?
One criticism of non-lethal predator control methods is that eventually, coyotes, wolves and other predators just get used to them and go back to killing livestock.
The Gittleson family runs a ranch near the Wyoming-Colorado state line and have lost cattle to wolves. Family members told Cowboy State Daily that theyâve tried a variety of deterrents, including stationary flashing lights mounted on stakes, but eventually wolves stopped being scared of them.
Young acknowledges that predators can get acclimated to non-lethal deterrents, but so far, FlashTags have passed that test.
At one test site, there was no evidence of coyotes developing âhabitationâ to FlashTags, even after two full seasons.
The secret could be that the lights donât just flash continuously.
âThey only go off after dark, and when the animal moves its ears,â she said.
In other words, the FlashTags are activated when livestock animals get agitated by a perceived threat in the night and start twitching their ears.
That seems to make predators directly associate trying to stalk livestock with a negative experience, she said.
âThe flashing lights go off and they (predators) think âwhoa, whatâs going on?ââ then run away and usually donât want to come back, she said.

Something Ranchers Are Used To
Young said a âdesign flawâ in the first batch of FlashTags caused many to break during the first season at one site.
However, thatâs been corrected, and itâs hoped that the tags can last ranchers for at least a couple of seasons before needing to be replaced, she said.
From ranchersâ perspective, the FlashTags are designed to be zero-maintenance, she said.
They can be attached like any other livestock ear tags âwhich is something ranchers are already used to doingâ and then essentially forgotten about, she said.
The tags are charged by solar energy during the daytime, so thereâs no batteries to change, she said.
FlashTags also donât seem to bother sheep and cattle, Young said, and thatâs important.
âWe didnât want to change the behavior of the livestock animals,â she said.
She also noted that FlashTags donât need to be attached to every animal in a livestock herd.
They can be effective when â10 to 15%Â of the animalsâ are wearing them, she said.

âWait And Seeâ
Longtime Wyoming sheep rancher Jim Magagna said heâs heard talk of FlashTags. He told Cowboy State Daily that heâs open to the idea, if further testing proves they really work over the long run.
âWeâre certainly open to any tools that will be effective in reducing the number of predations and that will be affordable to the livestock producers,â said Magagna, the executive vice president of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association.
If the tabs catch on, heâd like to see some sort of âfunding programâ to help offset the costs to ranchers, he said.
For now, heâs taking a âwait and seeâ approach to FlashTag technology.
Magagna noted that most of the losses his familyâs ranch has suffered have been to coyotes, as well as some losses to black bears in the Wind River Mountains.
âIn the early days, 'lethal take' of predators was the preferred method of cutting losses, he said.
He recalled a bad episode with wolves in the 1990s.
âFor about two years, we had very significant losses to wolves,â he said.
âAfter the second year, and after I had lost over 60 head of sheep, Wildlife Services obtained a permit and removed the wolf pack that had been doing the depredations,â he said.
Mark Heinz can be reached at mark@cowboystatedaily.com.




