Much of the debate about Wyomingās wild horses swirls around one question ā are they truly wild horses or a feral invasive species?
That doesnāt matter, a wildlife researcher said, because as he sees it, even species considered āinvasiveā to an ecosystem also can be beneficial.
āI think part of the problem is, the ānativenessā question just closes the door on compromise,ā Erick Lundgren told Cowboy State Daily.
Heās a wildlife biologist and researcher based in Arizona and is one of several authors of a new scientific paper challenging the āinvasive speciesā narrative that has driven wildlife management in Wyoming, the West and around the world.
Wild horse advocate Chad Hanson of Casper told Cowboy State Daily he thinks that the narrative of mustangs being in competition with big game animals might get it all wrong.
āFor the past 12 years that Iāve spent observing wild horses in the field, itās been obvious that elk, deer and antelope seek out and spend time in the company of mustangs where they can,ā he said.
Others disagree. Retired U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist David Paullin of Sheridan recently told Cowboy State Daily that heās worried about the effects of mustangs on some of Wyomingās premiere mule deer and antelope herds.
With the deer and antelope still struggling to recover from massive winterkill in 2022-2023, the last thing they need is competition from mustangs for food and water, he said.
The debate over invasive species isnāt limited to Wyoming, itās global, and there are plenty of high-profile examples. Perhaps the most notorious are the ācocaine hippos,ā the nickname for an exploding non-native population of the giant beasts in Colombia that started with four hippos brought there by drug kingpin Pablo Escobar.
Now there are about 170 hippos roaming the Colombian countryside not only disrupting the local ecosystem, but also reportedly becoming aggressive toward people.
In Australia, feral camels are a holdover from the 19th century when British India and Afghanistan brought camels to the country as beasts of burden. People there are concerned because the now-feral populations of the animals can destroy water holes for native wildlife.

Itās Function That Matters
Whether a species is ānativeā actually matters far less than how it interacts with the land it is on, Lundgren said.
In that respect, āthereās no discernible difference between native and introduced species,ā he said. āThe language of āinvasive biologyā just reduces that into a binary ā good and evil.ā
For instance, horses in some areas graze off courser vegetation, which deer and antelope wonāt touch, but that can leave room for forage that the game herds will eat, he said. And horses use their size as an advantage at times.
āThe evidence regarding competition between horses and smaller ungulates shows that, yeah, the horses might chase off the pronghorn. But that (larger animal dominance) happens in any system,ā Lundgren said.
Even so, he questions whether that happens enough to truly harm antelope and deer.
After all, antelope and deer for tens of thousands of years shared habitat in what is now Wyoming and the surrounding region with plenty of larger animals, up to and including mammoths, he said.
Predators can also play an important role, he noted, though they also can be unfairly demonized.
āMountain lions in Nevada kill feral horses, and yet we kill mountain lions at an astonishing rate there, funded by taxpayer money,ā Lundgren said, adding that just because a species is ānativeā that doesnāt mean it canāt be harmful under the wrong circumstances.
āBack East, there are tons of whitetail deer and they can really trash landscapes,ā he said. āAnd we know why. There are no predators left back there to control them.ā
Cattle And Camels
Cattle also frequently come up in debates over Wyomingās mustangs. Ranchers claim that the mustangs compete for the resources they need to keep their herds viable.
Meanwhile, wild horse advocates argue that the horses are blamed for damaging range and game herds that were actually harmed by cattle.
And although beef cattle are themselves a non-native species, itās how they interact with the environment that matters, Lungren said. Cows that stay in one place to long can cause damage.
āIāve seen plenty of places grazed to hell by cows, where theyāre standing in one place all day long, not moving,ā he said.
However, when cattle are moved across the landscape, grazing as they go, they can fill the same ecological niche as other large herbivore species, he said.
Species come and go, and interestingly, Wyoming once had camels, he said.
Camels have become a flashpoint for controversy in Australia that in many ways mirrors the tensions over mustangs in Wyoming.
Camels were introduced to Australia as a means of long-distance desert transport in the days before trucks became plentiful and reliable enough to fill that role, Lungren said.
Since then, the camels have reproduced and spread out across the landscape.
āItās currently the only wild population of dromedary camels in the world,ā he said.
However, many ranchers donāt like them, saying they tear down fences and corrals and hog water supplies. So, some Aussie ranchers will gun camels down by the dozens.
Lundgren said thereās scant research into how much damage the camels actually do.

Everybody Gather At The Watering Hole
Hanson said heās seen cattle, mustangs, elk, deer and antelope all gather at waterholes and peacefully share the resource.
And research backs that up, he said.
āA team of four University of Wyoming professors ādid not find evidence of interference competition between feral horses, cattle, and pronghorn.ā The authors also discovered that, āmule deer and elk watering activity also overlapped with horses and cattle,āā he said.
Hanson added that if horses were absent from Wyomingās ancient landscapes, it wasnāt for long. And, like Lundgren, he argues that whether the mustangs are the same species as the horses that were here before doesnāt matter as much as some claim it does.
āFor the record, the oldest horse fossils on earth were found in Wyoming, and recent data suggest that horses survived here longer than we ever thought,ā he said. āNew DNA evidence places them on this continent 5,000 years ago ā a sliver of time in geologic terms.
āEquine history and evolution are fascinating, but biologists increasingly have no use for the distinction between native or non-native fauna.ā
Mark Heinz can be reached at mark@cowboystatedaily.com.





