Wyoming lawmakers want to penalize parents who run off with their children while leaving their spouses or ex-spouses behind, but arenât not sure how to do it. Â
When it happens in violation of a custody order, parental abduction of a child already is a felony under Wyomingâs interference with custody laws, punishable by up to five years in prison. Â
Itâs not always easy to prosecute, according to Monday testimony at the Wyoming Legislatureâs Joint Judiciary Committee meeting.Â
âOur NightmareâÂ
A couple from Cody told the committee their granddaughterâs father ran away with the girl for weeks at a time and barely suffered for it. They asked for consideration of adding a larger variety of charges from which prosecutors may choose. Â
Julie and Fred Snelson said their 6-year-old grandchildâs mother lives in Billings and father in Wyoming. The mother has custody most of the year. Â
Though the girlâs mother â the Snelsonsâ daughter â has moved to Montana, the custody case will stay in the Park County District Court until the girl turns 18, unless her father also leaves Wyoming. Â
When the girl was not quite 3 years old, âher father and his girlfriend took her from day care and hid her and cut off all communication,â said Julie Snelson. âBefore then, sheâd never lived a day without her mother.â Â
Julie Snelson said there were no repercussions for that except a âgood scolding by the judge.â Â
She said there have been two instances since then. In January, said Snelson, the girlâs father took her far longer than his Christmas-break visitation terms allowed and she missed 26 days of school. Â
The girl believed that her mother had left her, Snelson said.
The Snelsons waited 45 days for a civil hearing to curb the fatherâs actions. Â
âNo amount of calls ⌠to any other authority could change this reality,â she said, adding that her local prosecutor would not charge the case criminally, saying it was a civil matter. Â
For showing contempt to the custody order, the judge had the girlâs father pay the Snelsonsâ $4,000 in attorneyâs fees that time, Snelson said. Â
âOur nightmare has not ended,â she continued, saying the father accosted the girl and her mother at the girlâs counselor center in Billings days later.
During the confrontation, the fatherâs girlfriend goaded the girlâs mother to fight her while the little girl â now 6 â hid under a blanket, screamed and cried, she said.
Thought PoliceÂ
Committee members discussed multiple options, as did members of the public.Â
Cheyenne-based family attorney Elizabeth Lance proposed introducing a uniform child abduction act into Wyomingâs statutes. She said judges could use the law to put a hold on parentsâ ability to get passports or travel to certain places during custody disputes if judges identify a risk that a parent may abscond. Â
Rep. Mark Jennings, R-Sheridan, worried that trying to anticipate what parents will do with respect to their own children could turn Wyoming authorities into the âthought police.â Â
âIâm certainly not interested in passing a thought police thing, even if itâs the courts that do it,â said Jennings. âI donât want to make it harder on them.â Â
Sen. Ed Cooper, R-Ten Sleep, agreed, saying itâs âreally dangerousâ to start limiting peopleâs rights with respect to their children before a custody order is in place. Â
Rep. Ember Oakley, R-Riverton, said she believes Jenningsâ worries of âthought policeâ could be soothed if judges under a new law hold evidentiary hearings to determine risk of parental abduction.
Judges also could have time limits under which they can impose narrow restrictions on parents in custody proceedings, she said.
Not The FelonyÂ
Jennings said heâs hesitant to add more anti-parental-abduction laws because interference with custody is already a felony in Wyoming, and state judges can apply civil or criminal contempt of court penalties. Â
He said it is puzzling, however, that prosecutors arenât often charging runaway parents with interference with custody. Â
Oakley, who also is a prosecutor in Fremont County, said the interference with custody law is daunting because itâs a five-year felony and there are always two sides to every story, especially in family law. Â
âYou can bring the two peopleâs sides and I promise you, you will get different stories,â said Oakley. âIt is emotional, it is as personal as it gets when youâre dealing with children.â Â
Oakley also discouraged her fellow committee members from thinking of criminal law as speeding up courtsâ handling of parental disputes. A âspeedy trial,â she said, can happen in as many as six months. Â
Committee members said they also want to hear from other prosecutors on why the charge isnât applied often. Â
Lance noted that defendants in interference cases can defend themselves by saying they took the children to keep them from harm. People who take children older than 14 at the childâs request and without intending to commit any criminal acts against them also can use those factors as an affirmative defense under the law. Â
Some committee members noted that could make for sticky cases in court. Â
Parental RightsÂ
Rep. Karlee Provenza, D-Laramie, raised the same concern as the Sheridan County Republican Partyâs chairman, Bryan Miller.Â
That is, prosecutors and judges likely worry about violating parental rights guaranteed as fundamental and enshrined in state statute. Â
âIf I were a judge Iâd be concerned about, if I infringe on those (rights) and move into criminal (charges), is that an infringement on that parental right?â said Provenza. âMaybe we have some case law that can help point us in that direction.â Â
Miller shared her concern.  Â
He said the Snelsonsâ story âis a sad one,â but legislators still should be careful not to over-legislate. Â
âIâd caution you to tread on parental rights lightly,â said Miller. Â
Rep. Ken Chestek, D-Laramie, said heâd like to start with a bill draft, study the issue more and continue to work on it. Â
Clair McFarland can be reached at: Clair@CowboyStateDaily.com





